Chinese Empire

The Fall of Imperial China: From Qing Decline to the Republic of 1912

The fall of imperial China was a long, slow, painful process that stretched from the late eighteenth century to the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor (Puyi) on 12 February 1912. It was not a single event but a cascade: military defeats, internal rebellions, fiscal exhaustion, foreign encroachments, failed reforms, and a popular revolution. The dynasty that fell in 1912 was, at the start of the nineteenth century, the largest, wealthiest, and most populous state in the world. The end of the imperial system — more than two millennia of monarchy — was a moment of singular importance in world history.

The fall of imperial China is treated in three parts in this site. The first part covers the crises of the late Qing: the Opium Wars, the unequal treaties, the loss of Hong Kong, the Taiping Rebellion, the Sino-French War, the First Sino-Japanese War, and the scramble for concessions. The second part covers the Boxer Rebellion and late Qing reform: the Boxer uprising of 1899–1901, the Boxer Protocol, the failure of the Hundred Days’ Reform, and the late Qing constitutional movement. The third part covers the revolution and the founding of the Republic: Sun Yat-sen, the Tongmenghui, the Wuchang Uprising, the abdication, and the early Republic. The late imperial deep-dive places these events in their longer Ming–Qing frame.

The Qing Empire at Its Height

The Qing Empire that began to fall in the early nineteenth century was the largest, most populous, and wealthiest state in the world. The reign of the Qianlong emperor (r. 1735–1796), the longest in Chinese imperial history, had been a period of maximum imperial reach. The empire in 1800 covered roughly 14.7 million square kilometers and governed perhaps 400 million people. The history of imperial Chinese dynasties puts the Qing in the context of two thousand years of imperial rule.

The Qing state was, in many ways, a model of late imperial governance. It had a sophisticated bureaucracy recruited by the civil service examination, a developed fiscal system, a competent military establishment, and a sophisticated diplomatic tradition. The history of imperial Chinese government describes the institutional structure. The economy was the largest in the world, with sophisticated markets, productive agriculture, and a wide network of internal and external trade. The economic history of late imperial China describes the economic structure.

The Qing state was also, however, an empire under strain. The population had grown from perhaps 150 million in 1700 to over 400 million by 1800, a doubling in a hundred years. The expansion of agricultural land had reached its limits; per capita grain output had been falling for a century. The fiscal system was antiquated; the central treasury could not easily grow with the population. The history of the late Qing crisis is the larger context.

The early nineteenth century saw the first signs of strain. The White Lotus Rebellion (1796–1804), an eight-year uprising in central China, cost the imperial treasury perhaps 200 million taels. The rebellion was suppressed only by relying on local militia forces. In 1813 the Eight Trigrams uprising briefly captured the imperial palace in Beijing. The court of the Jiaqing emperor (r. 1796–1820) and the Daoguang emperor (r. 1820–1850) was increasingly unable to meet the structural challenges it faced. The history of imperial Chinese military institutions is the military context.

The fiscal crisis was deepening. The imperial revenue had been largely fixed since the seventeenth century, while the population had grown. The land tax, the main source of revenue, was based on the assumption of stable productivity per acre, which had been falling for a century. The state could not easily raise new taxes; the only major new source of revenue was the customs duties from the treaty ports, which were largely under foreign control after 1842. The salt tax, the second-largest source of revenue, was increasingly pledged to foreign indemnities after 1901. The economic history of late imperial China describes the fiscal context in detail.

The political crisis was no less severe. The Qianlong emperor’s long reign had been followed by a succession of short reigns, child emperors, and regencies. The Jiaqing emperor (r. 1796–1820) had inherited the corruption of the Heshen era and was unable to reform the bureaucracy. The Daoguang emperor (r. 1820–1850) was conscientious but ineffective. The Xianfeng emperor (r. 1850–1861) fled Beijing in 1860 before the Anglo-French army. The Tongzhi emperor (r. 1861–1875) died at nineteen. The Guangxu emperor (r. 1875–1908) spent most of his reign under the thumb of the Empress Dowager Cixi, who had become the real power in the empire. The history of imperial Chinese government describes the political structure.

The intellectual crisis was, perhaps, the deepest. The Confucian order that had legitimated the dynasty for two thousand years was no longer self-evidently adequate. The missionaries who came with the British and French were preaching a different cosmology; the colonial territories that the European powers were establishing on China’s borders were a different kind of state; the industrial technology that was being smuggled in through the treaty ports was a different kind of economy. The philosophical background of late imperial China describes the intellectual crisis in detail.

The Closing of the Chinese Door

The Qing’s encounter with the West began long before the Opium War. The Macartney Mission of 1793, in which the British envoy Lord Macartney sought to open China to British trade, had been rebuffed by the Qianlong emperor, who wrote to King George III that “the Celestial Empire possesses all things in prolific abundance and lacks no product within its own borders.” The Qing had had little interest in European manufactured goods, and the British had responded by exporting opium from Bengal, creating a structural trade imbalance that would lead to war.

The Qing rejection of the Macartney Mission was a turning point in world history. A different Chinese response — an opening to British trade, an exchange of ambassadors, a serious study of European science and technology — might have set China on a different path. Instead, the Qing closed the door. Foreign trade was confined to the single port of Canton, where it was conducted through a guild of Chinese merchants, the Cohong. The British, the Americans, the French, the Dutch, and the Swedes each had their own factories (trading warehouses) on the riverbank, but the system was rigid and humiliating. The British East India Company lost its monopoly on the China trade in 1834, and the new British “free trade” merchants in Canton, who lacked experience of the system, repeatedly clashed with the Qing officials. The history of the late Qing crisis is the larger context.

The closed-door policy was rooted in the Confucian cosmology, in which China was the Middle Kingdom (中国, Zhongguo) and the surrounding peoples were “barbarians” (夷, yi). The policy was enforced by the tributary system, in which foreign states could trade with China only if they accepted the Chinese emperor as the Son of Heaven and kowtowed to him. The British and other Europeans, who did not accept the Chinese emperor’s supremacy, found the system increasingly intolerable. The history of imperial Chinese government is the institutional context.

The First Opium War (1839–1842) was the first major conflict between Qing China and a Western industrial power. The war was triggered by the imperial commissioner Lin Zexu’s destruction of 1,200 tons of British-owned opium at Humen in 1839. The British response was the first major expeditionary force in East Asia in the modern era: steam-powered gunboats, percussion-cap muskets, and modern iron cannon. The Qing, with their matchlock muskets and antiquated defenses, were defeated in a series of engagements along the southern coast and the Yangzi valley. The Treaty of Nanking (1842) ceded Hong Kong, opened five treaty ports, fixed a low tariff, and established the most-favored-nation principle. It was the first of the “unequal treaties” — a phrase that captured both the legal and the moral imbalance.

The economic history of the late Qing crisis describes the structural background of the war. The British had a chronic trade deficit with China; the silver that should have been flowing into China was now flowing out to pay for opium. The Qing, having lost the war, was unable to enforce its anti-opium policy. The Daoguang emperor, who had been the force behind Lin’s anti-opium campaign, died in 1850. The dynasty was in a fiscal crisis, a legitimacy crisis, and a military crisis. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the war in detail.

The Taiping Rebellion (1850–1864)

The Taiping Rebellion (太平天国运动, 1850–1864) was the bloodiest civil war in human history. The rebellion was led by Hong Xiuquan, a failed examination candidate from Guangdong who had visions in which he identified himself as the younger brother of Jesus Christ. He founded the God-Worshipping Society (拜上帝会, Bai Shangdi Hui) in the 1840s, drawing followers from the dispossessed Hakka of the Guangxi–Guangdong borderland. In 1851 he declared himself the Heavenly King, and the rebellion began in earnest.

The Taiping armies took Nanjing in March 1853 and established the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom (太平天国, Taiping Tianguo), with Nanjing renamed the Heavenly Capital. For eleven years, the Taiping regime controlled a vast swath of south-central China. The Taiping program was a syncretic mixture of Old Testament prophecy, popular Christianity, and traditional Chinese millenarianism: the prohibition of opium, alcohol, foot-binding, polygamy, and Confucian ancestor worship; a quasi-socialist land system; and a state church.

The war was a catastrophe. It killed an estimated 20 to 30 million people, through battle, famine, and disease, and it devastated the central Yangzi, China’s most productive rice belt. The war weakened the Qing in several ways. It broke the dynasty’s monopoly on organized violence; the regional armies that saved the empire were personal followings of provincial officials, not instruments of the central state. It exhausted the imperial treasury. It forced the dynasty to rely on regional military strongmen, who would dominate Chinese politics for the next half-century. The military history of the late Qing crisis describes the campaigns in detail.

The Taiping Rebellion was finally suppressed in 1864, when the Xiang Army of Zeng Guofan’s brother Zeng Guoquan took Nanjing on 19 July 1864. Hong Xiuquan had already died in June 1864, possibly by suicide. The mass suicides of the Taiping garrison and their families were one of the grimmest episodes of the war. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the rebellion as a turning point.

The Treaty Port System and the Imperialist Scramble

The opening of the treaty ports created a new economic geography. Shanghai, which had been a medium-sized coastal city, became the financial and commercial center of the new China. The British, the American, and the French concessions on the Bund, built in the 1850s and 1860s, were self-contained foreign cities, with their own police, courts, and tax systems. The Chinese, who lived in the surrounding Chinese city, were subject to Chinese law. The treaty port system, which lasted until 1943, integrated the Chinese economy into the world economy on unequal terms. The economic history of the late Qing crisis describes the economic impact.

The treaty port system had several features that made it a structural irritant. Foreign residents were subject to the extraterritorial jurisdiction of their own consuls, not to Chinese law. Chinese residents of the foreign concessions paid rent and taxes to foreign authorities. The customs service, formally a Chinese government agency, was in practice run by foreigners, primarily the British Inspector General of the Imperial Maritime Customs Service Robert Hart and his successors. The customs receipts, which were the main source of new imperial revenue, were pledged to the service of the foreign indemnities after 1901. The history of the late Qing crisis is the context.

The 1890s saw the great powers divide China into spheres of influence. Germany seized Jiaozhou Bay in 1898. Russia leased Port Arthur and Dalian. Britain leased Weihaiwei and the New Territories. France leased Kwangchowan. Japan claimed Fujian. Italy demanded a lease of Sanmen Bay. The United States, having been excluded from the scramble, proclaimed the Open Door in 1899–1900, calling for the preservation of China’s territorial and administrative integrity and for equal commercial access for all foreign powers. The policy was largely unsuccessful; it did not prevent the powers from consolidating their positions, and it did not protect Chinese sovereignty. The history of the late Qing crisis describes the scramble in detail.

The result was a system of unequal treaties, foreign concessions in the treaty ports, foreign-controlled railways and mining, and the stationing of foreign troops in Beijing and along the railway lines. The Qing state, the largest and wealthiest in the world at the start of the nineteenth century, was by 1900 a semi-colony. The history of the fall of imperial China treats this moment as a turning point.

The Second Opium War (1856–1860) and the Self-Strengthening Movement (1861–1895)

The Second Opium War (1856–1860) deepened the Qing crisis. The war was triggered by the Arrow incident of 1856, in which Chinese officials boarded a Hong Kong-registered ship and lowered its flag, and by the French over the execution of a French missionary. The Anglo-French expeditionary force, under Lord Elgin, took Canton in 1857, Tianjin in 1858, and Beijing in 1860. The Treaties of Tianjin (1858) and the Convention of Beijing (1860) opened ten more ports, legalized the opium trade, allowed foreign legations in Beijing, allowed Christian missionary activity in the interior, and required China to cede the Russian maritime territory in Manchuria. The sacking of the Old Summer Palace (Yuanmingyuan) by the Anglo-French troops in October 1860 was an act of cultural destruction that has never been acknowledged or made good. The history of the imperial architecture of Beijing describes the buildings that were destroyed.

The Self-Strengthening Movement (c. 1861–1895) was the Qing response. Led by Zeng Guofan, Li Hongzhang, and Zuo Zongtang, the movement tried to combine Western military and industrial technology with Confucian values. It built modern arsenals (Jiangnan Arsenal in Shanghai, Hanyang Ironworks), shipyards (Fuzhou Navy Yard), and the Beiyang Fleet, the most modern navy in East Asia. It sent students abroad and established modern schools.

The Self-Strengthening Movement failed in the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895. Japan, a country that had begun its own modernization only twenty years earlier, destroyed the Beiyang Fleet and the Liaodong army, and dictated the Treaty of Shimonoseki. China had to cede Taiwan, pay a 200-million-tael indemnity, and open four more ports. The defeat discredited the entire self-strengthening approach. The history of the late Qing crisis describes the war in detail.

The Hundred Days’ Reform (1898) and the Boxer Rebellion (1899–1901)

The Hundred Days’ Reform (戊戌变法, wuxu bianfa) of 1898 was a brief but intense attempt to transform the Chinese state on the model of the Japanese Meiji Restoration. It was championed by a small group of officials, led by Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao, with the support of the Guangxu emperor. The reform edicts — more than 110 of them in 103 days — abolished the traditional eight-legged essay, ordered the establishment of modern schools in every province, and proposed the creation of a modern university in Beijing. They called for the modernization of the military, the construction of railways, the development of mining and industry, and the reform of the legal code.

The reform was crushed in a coup on 21 September 1898. The Empress Dowager Cixi, supported by the conservative Manchu prince Ronglu, took control of the government, placed the Guangxu emperor under house arrest, and executed six of the leading reformers. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the failure of the reform as a turning point.

The Boxer Rebellion (义和团运动, yihetuan yundong) of 1899–1901 was the most violent expression of the popular anti-foreign feeling that the failure of self-strengthening and the scramble for concessions had created. The Boxers, who called themselves the Yihetuan (Righteous and Harmonious Fists), were a popular movement of northern Chinese peasants, workers, and demobilized soldiers. They practiced a ritual martial arts, believed that they could become invulnerable to bullets through chanting and postures, and directed their rage against the foreign missionaries, Chinese Christians, and the foreign legations.

The Boxers entered Beijing in May 1900, and the legation quarter was cut off on 20 June. About 900 foreigners and some 2,800 Chinese Christians were besieged for 55 days. The Eight-Nation Alliance — Britain, France, Germany, Russia, the United States, Japan, Italy, and Austria-Hungary — sent a relief expedition, which reached the legations on 14 August 1900. The Boxer Protocol of September 1901 imposed a 450-million-tael indemnity (then about US$333 million), the execution of reform-minded officials, the stationing of foreign troops in Beijing, and the destruction of the Taku forts. The Protocol was the harshest of the unequal treaties, and it effectively ended the Qing as an independent power. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the Boxer Protocol as the moment when the dynasty ceased to be a sovereign state.

The Late Qing Constitutional Movement (1901–1911)

The Boxer Protocol was followed by a series of reform edicts. The Empress Dowager Cixi, recognizing the depth of the crisis, ordered a program of “New Policies” (新政) that included the establishment of modern schools, the abolition of the civil service examination in 1905, the creation of a new cabinet system, and the preparation of a constitutional monarchy on the Japanese model. In 1908 the Outline of Imperial Constitution (钦定宪法大纲) was promulgated, and in 1909 provincial assemblies were established. A national assembly was established in 1910.

The constitutional movement had several effects. It created a constitutionalist faction, including Zhang Jian and Tang Shaoyi, who pressed for genuine constitutional government. It created a constitutionalist-revolutionary split in the anti-Qing movement, between those who wanted to reform the dynasty and those who wanted to overthrow it. And it created a generation of Chinese students abroad — in Japan, in Europe, in the United States — who were exposed to Western political thought and who would provide the leadership of the 1911 revolution. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the constitutional movement in detail.

The late Qing reforms came too late. The dynasty had lost the support of the gentry, the merchant class, the army, and the new provincial assemblies. The promised constitution was delayed; the provincial assemblies, established in 1909, became platforms for the constitutional movement; the national assembly, established in 1910, was given only a consultative role. The Guangxu emperor had died in November 1908 — possibly murdered on the orders of Cixi, who had died the previous day — and the throne had passed to the boy emperor Puyi, the Xuantong Emperor. The history of the Chinese imperial family is the larger context.

Sun Yat-sen and the Revolutionary Movement

The revolutionary movement had been building for a decade before 1911. Its leader was Sun Yat-sen (孙中山, 1866–1925), a Christian, a medical doctor, and a long-time revolutionary organizer. He had founded the Revive China Society (兴中会, Xingzhonghui) in Honolulu in 1894, and he had organized a series of failed uprisings in south China in the 1890s and 1900s. In 1905 he and a group of like-minded revolutionaries, including Huang Xing, Song Jiaoren, Hu Hanmin, and Cai E, had founded the United League (中国同盟会, Tongmenghui) in Tokyo.

Sun’s Three Principles of the People (三民主义, san min zhuyi) — nationalism, democracy, and people’s livelihood — provided a coherent ideology for the revolutionary movement. The Three Principles were a synthesis of Chinese tradition and Western political thought. Nationalism called for the recovery of Chinese sovereignty from the Manchu Qing and the great powers; democracy for the establishment of a republican government based on popular sovereignty; and people’s livelihood for a program of social welfare and economic regulation. The philosophical background of these ideas draws on Chinese and Western sources.

The Tongmenghui was, in practice, a loose coalition. It drew its members from overseas Chinese, students in Japan, and the secret societies of south China. It published a newspaper, Min Bao (民报, The People’s Journal), in which Sun and his allies debated the gradualist constitutionalists led by Liang Qichao. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the revolutionary movement in detail.

The 1911 Wuchang Uprising and the Provisional Republic

The Wuchang Uprising began as an accident. In September 1911 the Qing government, alarmed by the spread of revolutionary activity in the New Army units stationed in the central Yangzi cities, ordered the Hubei provincial government to arrest known revolutionaries. The list of names was leaked, and the revolutionary societies decided to act at once. On 9 October 1911, a group of revolutionaries was preparing bombs in the Russian Concession of Hankou when one of them exploded. The conspirators realized that the authorities would be alerted and would come for them; they decided to launch the planned uprising that night.

The actual uprising broke out on the evening of 10 October 1911. The New Army units in Wuchang mutinied, killing their officers and seizing the city. The Qing viceroy fled; the commander of the garrison was unable to rally his troops. By the next morning, the revolutionaries controlled the three cities of Wuchang, Hankou, and Hanyang. The Hubei Military Government was set up under the leadership of Li Yuanhong, a former Qing general who had joined the revolution.

The Wuchang Uprising triggered a cascade of provincial declarations of independence. Within a few days, revolutionary uprisings had broken out in Changsha, Xi’an, Nanchang, and other cities. By the end of November, fifteen of the eighteen provinces of “China proper” had broken with the Qing. The court tried to send the Beiyang Army under Yuan Shikai to crush the revolution, but Yuan, who saw the situation as an opportunity, stalled.

In December 1911, the various revolutionary groups met in Nanjing to organize a provisional government. Sun Yat-sen, who had been abroad fundraising and organizing, was elected provisional president of the Republic of China on 29 December 1911. He took office on 1 January 1912, the formal founding of the Republic of China. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the founding of the Republic in detail.

The Abdication of the Xuantong Emperor (1912)

The abdication of the Xuantong Emperor on 12 February 1912 was the formal end of the imperial system. The regent Empress Dowager Longyu, sister of the late Empress Dowager Cixi and regent for the boy emperor Puyi, signed the abdication edict on behalf of her nephew. The edict transferred sovereignty to the Republic of China and was issued under the advice of Yuan Shikai. The boy emperor was allowed to remain in the Forbidden City as a private citizen, and a small imperial household was maintained for several years.

The Puyi who abdicated in 1912 was a small child of six. He had been born in 1906 as the son of Chun, Prince Chun, the eighth son of the Daoguang emperor, and had been named heir apparent in 1908 after the death of the Guangxu emperor. He had been enthroned as the Xuantong Emperor in December 1908, and had reigned in name only. The history of the Chinese imperial family is the larger context.

The abdication was peaceful. The Forbidden City, the imperial household, and the imperial tombs were preserved. The former emperor was given a generous annual subsidy (eventually defaulted on in 1924 when the warlord Feng Yuxiang expelled him from the Forbidden City). The imperial household continued to maintain its rituals, its genealogies, and its collection of imperial art. Puyi would later be installed by the Japanese as the puppet emperor of Manchukuo from 1932 to 1945, and would die in 1967 as a gardener in the People’s Republic.

The abdication was the formal conclusion of a long, slow, painful adjustment to modernity. The dynasty that had ruled China for more than two millennia, since the Qin unification of 221 BCE, was over. The new Republic of China, however imperfect, was the first non-monarchical government in Chinese history. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the abdication as the conclusion of the imperial age.

The Causes of the Fall

The fall of imperial China had multiple causes, which historians have debated for more than a century. The conventional explanations include the following:

  • Military weakness. The Qing army was unable to match Western and Japanese forces on the battlefield. The defeat by Britain in 1842, the defeat by France in 1885, the defeat by Japan in 1895, and the defeat by the Eight-Nation Alliance in 1900 demonstrated the structural military weakness of the dynasty. The history of imperial Chinese military institutions describes the military context.
  • Fiscal weakness. The Qing fiscal system was antiquated; the central treasury could not easily grow with the population. The indemnities, particularly the Boxer indemnity of 1901, were a permanent drain on the imperial finances. The economic history of late imperial China describes the fiscal context.
  • Political decay. The Qing court was divided between conservative and reformist factions; the Empress Dowager Cixi was a brilliant politician but an enemy of serious reform. The history of imperial Chinese government describes the political context.
  • The broken Confucian consensus. The Confucian order that had legitimated the dynasty for two thousand years was no longer self-evidently adequate. The Taiping Rebellion, with its millenarian Christian program, had shown that the old consensus was breaking. The philosophical context of late imperial China describes the intellectual crisis.
  • Population pressure. The population of the Qing Empire had grown from perhaps 150 million in 1700 to over 400 million by 1800, a doubling in a hundred years. The per capita grain output had been falling for a century. The economic history of late imperial China describes the demographic context.
  • Foreign encroachments. The unequal treaties, the foreign concessions, the foreign-controlled railways and mining, and the stationing of foreign troops in Beijing compromised Chinese sovereignty. The history of the late Qing crisis describes the foreign context.
  • The failure of reform. The Self-Strengthening Movement, the Hundred Days’ Reform, and the late Qing constitutional movement all failed to modernize the dynasty. The history of the late Qing crisis describes the reform attempts.
  • The rise of nationalism. A new Chinese nationalism, fed by the foreign encroachments and the failure of reform, was increasingly directed against the Manchu dynasty. The history of Chinese culture in the imperial period describes the cultural context.

No single cause was sufficient. The fall of imperial China was the result of all of them, working together over a long period.

The Meaning of the Fall

The fall of imperial China was a turning point in world history. The imperial system, which had ruled China for more than two millennia, was over. The new Republic of China, however imperfect, was the first non-monarchical government in Chinese history. The 1911 revolution, in Chinese nationalist memory, is the founding moment of modern China.

The fall of imperial China is not just a Chinese story. It is part of a global transformation, in which the industrial revolution, the global silver and opium trades, and the European imperial expansion of the late nineteenth century all converged on a Qing Empire that had once been the largest economy in the world. The end of the imperial system in 1912 was the formal conclusion of a long, slow, painful adjustment to modernity.

The legacy of the imperial system continues to shape contemporary China. The idea of a unified, multi-ethnic Chinese state, which the Qing had pioneered, is the source of many of the territorial claims of the People’s Republic of China. The idea of a constitutional government, which the late Qing had tried to establish, is the basis of the constitutional debates of the present. The idea of a reformed Confucianism, which Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao had tried to develop, is part of the contemporary discussion of Chinese values. The history of the Chinese imperial period is the larger context in which these legacies are to be understood.

The Revolutionary Generation

The revolutionary movement that overthrew the Qing was the product of a generation of Chinese students abroad, in Japan, in Europe, and in the United States. The most important destination was Japan, which had been the first East Asian country to modernize, and which had welcomed Chinese students. By 1906 there were perhaps 13,000 Chinese students in Japan, the great majority of them studying in Tokyo and other major cities. They were exposed to Western political thought — to the writings of Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, Henry George, and Karl Marx — and to Japanese Meiji reformism.

The Chinese student community in Japan was, however, divided. The Sun Yat-sen faction, organized in the Tongmenghui, argued for the overthrow of the Qing and the establishment of a republic. The Liang Qichao faction, organized in the Min Bao and other journals, argued for the reform of the dynasty and the establishment of a constitutional monarchy. The two factions debated fiercely in the pages of their journals, and they recruited competing followings among the students. The split between the revolutionaries and the constitutionalists would last until 1911, when the collapse of the dynasty would force the constitutionalists to choose between the monarchy and the republic.

The Chinese student community in Japan also generated a broader political culture. The students organized study societies, debating clubs, and political newspapers. They read translations of Western political works. They formed secret societies and revolutionary cells. They planned uprisings in China, some of which were launched from Japanese territory. The Japanese government, which had its own reasons for wanting to weaken the Qing, often looked the other way. The history of the late Qing crisis describes the revolutionary generation in detail.

The revolutionary movement was, however, more than a student movement. The overseas Chinese communities — in Southeast Asia, in North America, in Europe — provided financial support, organizational networks, and a sense of identity. The secret societies of south China — the Triads, the Hongmen, the Tiandihui — provided cadres, local knowledge, and access to weapons. The New Army units in the central Yangzi cities, which had been built up under the Self-Strengthening Movement, provided the military muscle for the Wuchang Uprising. The revolution was a coalition of very different forces, and it succeeded because the dynasty was no longer capable of defending itself.

The Founding of the Republic and the Warlord Era

The Republic of China, which was formally established on 1 January 1912, was a fragile institution. The provisional government of Sun Yat-sen in Nanjing had no real power. The Beiyang Army, the most modern military force in China, was loyal to Yuan Shikai. The southern provinces, which had declared independence from the Qing, were governed by military strongmen who had their own agendas. The foreign powers, which had supported the Qing, were unwilling to recognize the new state until it could demonstrate that it could govern.

The Republic was, in practice, dominated by Yuan Shikai from 1912 to 1916. Yuan, who had been elected provisional president by the Nanjing provisional senate in February 1912, was inaugurated as the first formal president in October 1913. He dissolved the parliament, suppressed the Kuomintang, and tried to establish a personal dictatorship. In late 1915 he declared himself emperor, taking the reign title Hongxian. The reaction was immediate: a “National Protection War” forced him to abandon the monarchy in March 1916, and he died of uremia in June 1916. The history of the late Qing crisis treats Yuan’s dictatorship in detail.

After Yuan’s death, China entered the warlord era, a period of political fragmentation in which regional military leaders held the real power. The most important of the warlords were Duan Qirui in the north, Wu Peifu in the central plains, Zhang Zuolin in Manchuria, and the southern military leaders who had declared independence from the Qing. The central government in Beijing was a phantom; real power was in the hands of the regional military leaders and their private armies. The warlord era lasted until 1928, when the Northern Expedition of the Nationalist government nominally reunified the country. The history of the late Qing crisis treats the warlord era in detail.

The warlord era was a period of great suffering for the Chinese people. The warlords taxed the peasantry heavily, often several times over, to support their armies. The warlord armies fought one another, devastating the countryside. The foreign powers, which had leased territory and controlled the customs service, treated the warlord government as a continuation of the Qing, and continued to enforce the unequal treaties. The history of the late Qing crisis is the context in which the warlord era is to be understood.

The Long View

The fall of imperial China is, in the long view, a story of the limits of a particular kind of state. The imperial Chinese state, in its mature form, was a sophisticated bureaucratic, fiscal, and military institution. It was, however, based on an agrarian economy and a Confucian ideology, and it was unable to adapt to the demands of an industrial, globalizing world. The dynasty that fell in 1912 had been unable to defend its sovereignty, modernize its economy, or reform its institutions. The new Republic of China, which succeeded it, would face the same problems in a different form.

The long imperial age, which had begun with the Qin unification of 221 BCE, was the longest period of unified rule in Chinese history. It produced the Confucian state, the imperial examination, the great Chinese philosophical and literary traditions, and a series of remarkable dynasties. It was, in many ways, a model of late imperial governance. The end of the imperial system in 1912 was, therefore, not just the end of a particular dynasty; it was the end of a long political tradition. The history of the Chinese imperial period treats the imperial age in its full sweep.

In this section